Three months ago, Chris Gledhill was an innovation technologist at one of the UKâs largest banks, Lloyds.
While it was a great job, he told CoinDesk, it was also incredibly frustrating. The scale of the bank meant he had insight into clear problems with the financial system, but it also meant he lacked any ability to change them.
So, he quit. Now, with the help of three (unnamed) co-founders Gledhill is building a âblockchain-inspiredâ challenger bank, Secco.
The aim is simple, he says: âTo disrupt banking from the outside in, rather than the inside out.â
Bitcoin, like many FinTech projects, owes much of its origin story to the 2008 financial crisis.
Although bitcoinâs first users sought it out as an alternative to a âbrokenâ financial system, six years on its technology is now in the hands of their enemies: the banks.
Just last month, a further 13 joined startup R3CEVâs campaign to establish a set of blockchain standards for the industry. (Lloyds is so far absent from its list.)
For Gledhill, this and other efforts, including VC investment in startups, simply arenât enough. Heâs âlargely frustratedâ at the level of innovation seen both inside and outside the worldâs largest financial services firms:
âItâs been incremental at best â¦Â Theyâre all saying âOK, letâs put it on the blockchainâ, but nobody is having a real look at whether thatâs still the ideal construct for how we go about financial services.â
âEven outside [the banks], the FinTech communities are innovating around existing financial protocols â making them cheaper, faster, better. Theyâre not trying to actually reinvent these things,â he added.
This includes things like loans, mortgages and current accounts â the contracts for which are often centuries old, according to Gledhill.
While he maintains itâs not enough to simply tag these products onto new rails, a growing number of blockchain startups and R&D teams are now attempting to do just this.
ItBitâs Bankchain and Blythe Mastersâ Digital Asset Holdings are among those digitising financial assets, while startups like Everledger are targeting physical goods in the supply chain, or in CEO Leanne Kempâs words, putting âbling on the blockchainâ.
How will Secco be different, then? For a start, Gledhill said, it wonât be anything like the image of a bank youâve got in your head.
Unsurprisingly, it wonât have branches â challenger banks donât tend to â but it also wonât have an app, nor an interface to speak of.
Instead, Secco will operate as an âunderlyingâ service hidden in all the apps and social platforms we use day-to-day. The aim of the game is âcustomer disengagement,â Gledhill said.
âWeâve been almost deliberately disruptive in that weâve taken what makes a bank today and pushed the needle in the opposite direction. The right answer is probably in the middle somewhere.â
Itâs not all about money, either. Down the road, Secco wants its users to become âdata brokersâ â treating their data as a currency to spend, lend and invest.
Secco and its users will each hold a cryptographic key, and both will be needed to confirm a transaction, in Seccoâs in-house token-based digital currency, from which the bank will take a small cut.
The bank will be built around a distributed database, which functions in a similar fashion to bitcoinâs blockchain. The entire data of the bank is spread around everybodyâs phone, so itâs owned by everybody and nobody.
However, it will run on something Gledhill calls a âblocktreeâ, currently awaiting patent, which he claims will solve a lot of the problems that come with bitcoinâs technology.
âThe blockchain is a linear structure, itâs very rigid. A blocktree gives you the ability to branch off these separate, mini blockchains to do offline transactions which can be merged at a later date.â
Due to the patent process, Gledhill said he cold not divulge further details about the technology, but hinted it would be a fairly open platform for people to challenge Seccoâs standards.
In recent months, a number of so-called challenger banks have arrived to take on the UKâs âBig Fourâ: Lloyds Banking Group, RBS, HSBC and Barclays.
While insiders have described the digital revolution as âseismicâ, it appears customer habits in the nation could prove challenging to break.
Statistics from the UKâs Competition and Markets Authority indicate 37% of consumers have held the same account for 20 years or more. Meanwhile, only 3% switched banking providers in 2014.
If customers are loathe to switch their provider, how will they be convinced to go with an app-less, branch-less alternative?
Gledhill says itâs a tough sell, however Secco â which is currently âreceiving interestâ from investors â wonât drop consumers in at the deep end too soon.
Next year, the firm will introduce users to its initial product, Aura, a location-based app that gives users the ability to trade data with others in a range of 60 meters.
For example, a user could receive a restaurant voucher in return for a tweet, or a number of other non-financial transactions.
Although far from Seccoâs utopian vision, Aura is needed to âlasso these giant concepts into something that makes sense for people,â Gledhill said.
âThere is a customer journey we need to take people on, youâre not going to get everybody suddenly throwing away all their money ⦠and become a data broker of themselves. We have to articulate that value for them.â
He added:
âIf people are not sure what we are, we believe we are onto something. If they donât think we are a bank thatâs potentially a good thing.â
Canary Wharf image via Shutterstock.Â