Saxo Capital Markets hosted the second instalment of its TradingDebates series yesterday at the iconic British Museum in London, UK.
The âFuture of Tradingâ event attracted many people from the Cityâs trading and investment community to discuss topics such as the geopolitical risks surrounding the energy markets and the future of the European Union. And of course, bitcoin and cryptocurrencies made an appearance.
In the last panel discussion of the afternoon, three speakers participated in the debate titled âAre Cryptocurrencies a Ponzi Scheme or a Real Currency Alternative?â
The panel comprised of the following members:
The discussion was moderated by Izabella Kaminska of FT Alphaville.
The debate kicked off on the back of yesterdayâs news that Bloomberg is now listing bitcoin prices on its financial terminals. The speakers largely agreed that it did not mean legitimization for bitcoin.
âWhat does it mean? Frankly, nothing,â said Birch, adding that it was good for companiesâ publicity.
Using the example of the local merchants now accepting bitcoin he said:
âThere are many shops that take bitcoin where you can buy pizzas. Nobody [uses bitcoin to buy goods], but you get featured on the BBC. If you are one of those places, itâs good publicity.â
Park added that Bloomberg was âlate to the gameâ.
In lieu of the fact that this event was held at the British Museum, which is home to some eight million pieces from all continents documenting human life from its beginnings to present, many references were made to the evolution of money from coins to paper to digital currency.
âIf we would be having this conversation 400 years ago,â said Birch, âpeople would say, âyou know what, that central bank idea sounds absolutely lunaticâ.â
Topics like bitcoin and crime, its volatility and deflationary nature, and technology behind cryptocurrencies also came up, as they do at many bitcoin events and talks.
However, when one of the panellists polled the audience to see how many people understood the technology behind cryptocurrencies, at least 80% of the room did not put their hands up.
The debate was poised to discuss the question if crytpocurrencies like bitcoin are an alternative for fiat currency but it turned out to be more of a high-level introduction session for the uninitiated in the audience.
In fact, one member of the audience said in the question round following the debate:
âYou guys have been talking Chinese.â
Naturally, a lot of time was spent explaining cryptocurrencies and the technology behind it.
When Park was trying to draw the distinction between the Bitcoin protocol and bitcoin as a currency, he got the two mixed up himself. He said âBig B was the currency and small b was the bitcoin protocol.â
In the end, the general consensus of the panel was that they thought that bitcoin â particularly the block chain â as a technology was promising, but they did not say it would replace fiat currency.
That was probably good news for many people from the banking industry in the audience.
Some prominent members of Londonâs financial community were present at the event, including Lars Seier Christensen, the co-founder and co-CEO of Saxo Bank.
Christensen made headlines earlier this year when he revealed his support for bitcoin and acknowledged that his online investment company was exploring bitcoinâs potential use.
British Museum image via Shutterstock