Just weeks ago, media outlets like Bloomberg and TechCrunch were all but declaring an end to bitcoinâs price volatility.
Posts like âBitcoinâs Emerging Price Stabilityâ were widely circulated on the bitcoin forums, and research from Wall Street analysts like ConvergEx Group asserted that bitcoin was âon the road to stabilityâ.
Then, overnight, all was quickly forgotten.
CNBC, the Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, BusinessWeek and Business Insider pounced on the bitcoin âcrashâ due to Mt. Goxâs technical issues. Further, outlets like the LA Times rushed to dig up quotes from outspoken bitcoin critics like, Mark Williams, who issued the follow statement to the New York State Department of Financial Services BitLicense panel:
âBitcoin is an experiment that needs to remain in the laboratory until it can meet the basic standards required to become a beneficial transaction currency.â
Hereâs the thing. These critics are right, bitcoin is failing as a currency today.
Thatâs why I believe the next major bitcoin innovation wonât be a wallet app or a merchant tool, but rather a product or method that effectively separates bitcoin, the currency, from bitcoin, the speculative investment.
Sometime, hopefully soon, some person or company is going to figure out how to securitize the holding risks of bitcoin and guarantee the underlying purchasing power of consumer and merchant bitcoin deposits.
Iâm not talking about âinstant conversionâ tools offered by companies like BitPay and Coinbase, but rather products that allow depositors to safely and securely hold bitcoins that wonât fluctuate wildly in price. Ideally, depositors wouldnât even know it, but they would be using this innovation to offload price volatility onto professional speculators with a higher risk tolerance.
In the process, bitcoin could begin acting like a currency for those who wish to use it as a unit of account for payments, while still preserving its properties as a high-beta investment. Itâs a simple idea with a complex solution and a potentially lucrative payout.
Someone is bound to crack the problem eventually.
Bitcoinâs price swings stem from the fact that it is simultaneously âe-cashâ (a currency) and âe-goldâ (a means of investment). This is problematic because combining the two usually means that one isnât acting as it should.
A stock with a 0% return is a poor investment, and a currency that can swing 10%+ or more in a day is a poor currency. Yet the ratio of bitcoin held for those vastly different purposes changes constantly and unpredictably.
Expectations of good news underpin investorsâ rationale for treating bitcoin as a speculative investment that could skyrocket in value, and yet good news itself depends on consumers and merchants using bitcoin as a stable unit of account. Itâs a circular reference.
A single bitcoin may end up with a value of $100,000 or it may crash to $0, but one thing is certain â it will not trade at a constant level in the long term. In that respect, critics are correct to say that bitcoin fails as a currency today. But will this always be the case?
Many believe the fix is a stronger derivatives market, but Coinbaseâs Fred Ehrsam told Wired in January that the current âderivatives, futures, and options market is largely underdevelopedâ, making todayâs âcounter-party risk unacceptableâ.
In other words, todayâs derivatives products are garbage.
And they could be for some time. Speaking from Munich at the DLD Conference, Circleâs Jeremy Allaire suggested that hedging products wouldnât improve until central governments provided better regulatory clarity. Only then can large, well-capitalized financial institutions from financial meccas like New York and London build their own market-making platforms.
Iâm sceptical, however, that a healthy, liquid derivatives market could materialize in the near-term to help individuals and smaller companies properly hedge against volatility. It is unlikely that small depositors would buy their own bitcoin futures, and even if they did, their coin would likely be expensive enough to offset any value gained from using the cryptocurrency as a payment system in the first place.
Besides, most of us consumers are used to low inflation, âstickyâ prices and stagnant wages. We simply arenât conditioned to go the extra mile to protect the purchasing power of our savings.
What will really drive down bitcoin volatility are better methods for connecting bitcoin wallets to Wall Street banks and their abundant investment capital.
In an environment where some bitcoin-related startups struggle to open checking accounts, volatility innovators wonât face any shortage of hurdles (or critics from within the bitcoin community), but you can bet those challenges wonât dissuade them from trying to solve such an important problem.
Algorithmic trading platforms are already being built, which will improve liquidity and mop up some of bitcoinâs excess volatility, and itâs just a matter of time before a new intermediary builds the pipes that allow Wall Street to securitize all of bitcoinâs volatility.
There are ways to effectively separate bitcoin into both a currency and a volatile investment. There is an institutional market hungry to absorb the risks and soak up the rewards of bitcoin. There are talented teams of bitcoin technologists and finance entrepreneurs eager to build new products. And there is a clear regulatory framework slowly emerging from government authorities.
The table is set to truly change the way ordinary people interact with the underlying bitcoin technology. Itâs no longer a question of whether these innovations are possible. Instead, itâs just a matter of when they will be available.
Ryan Galt is a blogger, entrepreneur and freelance opinion writer for CoinDesk. His opinions do not necessarily reflect CoinDeskâs. You may email him at 2bitidiot@gmail.com, or follow him on twitter @twobitidiot.
Market action image via Shutterstock